Western States Law Library  ›  Arizona

Western States Auto Insurance & Crash Law Library

Arizona Auto Insurance & Crash Law

A 23-guide public legal education library for understanding Arizona automobile liability, insurance coverage, UM/UIM, stacking, insurer duties, commercial and rideshare vehicles, comparative fault, damages, wrongful death, reimbursement and settlement.

Current-law review: Sept. 13, 2026 23 Arizona guides 25 / 50 / 15 minimum liability Pure comparative negligence

Arizona crash law begins with four separate questions

A crash does not produce one insurance question. The investigation should separately determine liability, insured status, available insurance and legally compensable loss before settlement closes any claim.

Question 1 Who is legally at fault?

Identify each driver, owner, employer, business, government entity and nonparty whose conduct contributed to the loss.

Question 2 Who is an insured?

Liability, UM/UIM, MedPay and other coverages can use different definitions of insured status.

Question 3 What insurance exists?

Search driver, owner, household, employer, commercial, umbrella, excess, rideshare and first-party policies.

Question 4 What is the complete loss?

Document injury, medical expense, earnings, household services, property loss and noneconomic damages before valuing settlement.

Arizona source-control rule: identify the statute, read the actual policy, then locate the controlling Arizona Supreme Court and published Court of Appeals authority.

Arizona current-law snapshot

25 / 50 / 15 Ordinary minimum motor-vehicle liability limits under A.R.S. §28-4009.
UM + UIM offered A.R.S. §20-259.01 requires Arizona insurers to offer both coverages under the statutory offer/rejection system.
Pure comparative fault A.R.S. §12-2505 generally reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's fault rather than imposing a 50% recovery bar.
Several liability A.R.S. §12-2506 generally makes each defendant responsible for that defendant's allocated percentage of fault, subject to exceptions.
Minimum insurance does not establish available insurance. A 25/50/15 statutory floor says nothing by itself about higher liability limits, permissive users, business coverage, umbrella insurance, excess insurance or first-party UM/UIM.

Several Arizona rules deserve special attention

UM/UIM is an offer-and-selection system

Arizona does not simply impose one fixed UM/UIM package. Section 20-259.01 requires insurers to make the coverages available and offer them to the named insured, with the declarations page playing an important role in the statutory selection or rejection process.

Stacking is a major Arizona issue

Section 20-259.01(H), Franklin v. CSAA, and the Arizona Supreme Court's 2026 Balzan decision make the number of policies, vehicles, insureds and applicable anti-stacking language critical to serious UM/UIM claims.

Fault includes nonparties

Section 12-2506 directs the fact finder to consider the fault of all persons who contributed to the injury when the statutory requirements for nonparty fault are satisfied.

Household liability limitations require scrutiny

Arizona permits certain family or household liability limitations to reduce otherwise higher liability coverage to the financial- responsibility minimum. The exact exclusion and current authority must be reviewed before applying it.

MedPay has a statutory lien rule

Section 20-259.01(J) permits a qualifying automobile insurer to assert a lien concerning MedPay amounts above $5,000 when statutory perfection requirements are satisfied, and requires fair and equitable compromise of the lien.

UM/UIM wrongful death has an extra insured-status requirement

Section 20-259.03 limits wrongful-death recovery from UM/UIM coverage to a qualifying wrongful-death claimant who is also a surviving insured under the applicable coverage, with an estate rule if none exists.

Rideshare coverage follows app status

A.R.S. §28-4038 creates different TNC insurance requirements depending on whether the driver is merely logged in, has accepted a ride or is transporting a passenger.

Claims handling has both statutory and common-law layers

A.R.S. §20-461 identifies unfair claim settlement practices, while Arizona appellate law separately governs contractual and common-law insurer good-faith duties.

The Arizona 23-guide system

The series moves from basic financial responsibility and insured status through specialized vehicle use, liability, damages, reimbursement, settlement and the Arizona case authority library.

Primary Arizona sources

VictimsGuide explains the system. The current primary sources control it.

Arizona Legislature

Current Arizona Revised Statutes, session laws and legislative history.

Arizona Legislature →
Arizona Judicial Branch

Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals opinions, dockets and case information.

Arizona Courts →
Arizona Department of Insurance & Financial Institutions

Automobile insurance requirements, consumer information and insurance regulation.

Arizona DIFI →
Arizona Department of Transportation

Motor vehicle registration, mandatory insurance and crash-related procedures.

Arizona DOT →
Arizona Supreme Court

Current Supreme Court opinions including the developing Arizona UM/UIM stacking authorities.

Supreme Court Cases →
Arizona Rules of Court

Civil procedure, discovery, disclosure and litigation requirements relevant after a crash claim enters suit.

Court Rules →
Currentness matters in Arizona. UM/UIM law is actively developing. Always verify the current text of §20-259.01 and the latest Arizona Supreme Court authority before relying on an older stacking or coverage decision.

Start with the complete Arizona coverage map.

Do not let the insurance card define the case. Identify every person and entity that may be legally responsible. Find every applicable policy. Determine insured status separately for each coverage. Preserve UM/UIM rights. Allocate fault under Arizona law. Document the complete loss. Then evaluate reimbursement and settlement only after the entire legal and insurance structure is visible.

Public legal education only. VictimsGuide.com provides public-interest legal education. It does not provide individualized legal advice, does not offer or accept legal representation, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Arizona automobile claims depend on the actual facts, insurance policies, endorsements, parties, deadlines, damages and current Arizona law. Verify controlling primary authority before legal reliance.