Western States Law Library  ›  Arizona  ›  Guide 13

Arizona Auto Insurance & Crash Law · Citizen Guide 13

Borrowed & Rental Vehicles

A crash involving a vehicle the driver does not own can activate several overlapping insurance systems. Arizona treats an ordinary borrowed car, conventional rental vehicle, dealer loaner and peer-to-peer shared car differently, so the vehicle relationship must be identified before determining coverage.

Current-law review: Sept. 13, 2026 Permissive use Owner policy usually primary A.R.S. §28-2166 Peer-to-peer sharing Graves Amendment

First identify what kind of non-owned vehicle was involved

Type 1 Borrowed car

Friend, neighbor or family member permits another person to use the owner's vehicle.

Type 2 Rental car

Commercial rental company provides the vehicle under a rental agreement.

Type 3 Dealer / repair loaner

Vehicle supplied temporarily by a dealership, garage or motor-vehicle business.

Type 4 Peer-to-peer shared car

Privately owned vehicle made available through a statutory car-sharing platform.

Do not call all four situations “rental cars.” Different Arizona statutes can determine who provides primary insurance, who must defend, and whether a personal auto policy may exclude the transaction.

For an ordinary borrowed car, begin with the vehicle owner's policy

Arizona's omnibus statute protects qualifying permissive users of a vehicle covered by the owner's motor-vehicle liability policy.

A.R.S. §28-4009(A)(2)

Named insured

The owner's liability policy protects the person named as the insured for liability arising from the covered vehicle.

Omnibus Insured

Permissive user

The policy must also protect another person using the covered vehicle with the named insured's express or implied permission.

The permission rule attaches to a covered vehicle. It protects a permissive driver using the owner's insured automobile; it does not mean the owner's policy follows every person into every vehicle.

Permission can be express or implied

  • direct permission to take the vehicle
  • regular family usage
  • prior unrestricted borrowing
  • possession of keys
  • employment practices
  • purpose for which vehicle was furnished
  • restrictions imposed by owner
  • whether permission was exceeded

Arizona generally makes insurance on the owned vehicle primary

A.R.S. §28-4010(B) provides a statutory priority rule when two or more valid and collectible liability policies apply to the same vehicle.

Primary Policy in which the crash vehicle is described or rated as an owned automobile.
Excess Other applicable liability policy or policies, subject to Arizona's special statutory exceptions.
Ordinary borrowed-car example: if Alice lends her insured car to Bob and Bob's personal policy also covers non-owned autos, Alice's applicable owned-vehicle liability policy is generally primary and Bob's applicable non-owned coverage is excess.
Do not use this rule mechanically for every vehicle. Arizona has different rules for motor-vehicle businesses, commercial rentals, peer-to-peer car sharing and other regulated uses.

The driver's own policy may provide another coverage layer

Personal automobile policies frequently contain coverage for certain vehicles not owned by the insured.

Temporary substitute

A vehicle temporarily replacing an insured vehicle because of repair, breakdown, servicing or another specified condition.

Non-owned auto

A vehicle the insured does not own that satisfies the policy's definition and use requirements.

Read the definitions carefully

  • named insured
  • family member
  • non-owned automobile
  • temporary substitute automobile
  • regular-use exclusion
  • permission requirement
  • business-use restriction
  • rental-vehicle language
  • other-insurance clause
Odom demonstrates the danger of assumptions. Arizona law did not require the renter's personal owner's policy to cover a friend merely because the renter gave that friend permission to drive the rental vehicle.

Insurance coverage does not automatically make the vehicle owner personally liable

A permissive driver can qualify as an insured under the owner's liability policy even when the owner is not personally liable for the driver's negligence.

Insurance question

Does the policy protect the permissive driver against the driver's own liability?

Tort question

Is there an independent legal basis to impose liability on the vehicle owner?

Possible owner-liability theories

Negligent entrustment

Did the owner negligently entrust the vehicle to an incompetent or unsafe driver under the circumstances?

Agency / employment

Was the driver acting as the owner's employee or agent?

Family purpose

Does Arizona's family purpose doctrine impose vicarious liability in the household relationship presented?

Young v. Beck: Arizona continues to recognize the family purpose doctrine independently of ordinary permissive-user insurance coverage.

Commercial rental vehicles operate under a separate Arizona statute

A.R.S. §28-2166 establishes financial-responsibility and claims rules for owners engaged in renting vehicles without drivers.

Special statutory limits: the current online text of §28-2166 still states 15/30/10 for the rental owner's specified statutory protection. Arizona's ordinary private-auto minimum under §28-4009 is 25/50/15. They are separate statutory systems.
§28-2166 protection Minimum stated in current statute
One person bodily injury/death $15,000
Two or more persons bodily injury/death $30,000
Property damage $10,000

Primary coverage is the statutory starting point

Subject to the statute's exceptions, the rental owner's liability insurance or statutory self-insurance obligation is primary to other available liability coverage.

The rental agreement can change the priority analysis

Section 28-2166 allows a rental owner to use a prescribed disclosure stating that it does not extend its financial responsibility or provide public liability coverage to the renter or drivers.

Do not assume “rental company is always primary.” Read the current rental agreement and apply §28-2166(C)-(E).

Obtain the entire agreement

  • renter identity
  • authorized drivers
  • insurance disclosure
  • affirmative acknowledgments
  • supplemental liability election
  • physical-damage election
  • prohibited uses
  • driver restrictions
  • return date and time
  • master rental agreement
  • online reservation terms

Arizona gives rental companies a specific twenty-day claims-information obligation

Under §28-2166(D), a rental owner can become obligated to respond to the third-party claim, provide the statutory financial responsibility and defend if specified conditions exist.

Condition 1

No other applicable renter liability coverage

The rental statute's protection and defense mechanism becomes important when no other available and applicable liability coverage exists.

Condition 2

Rental owner fails to provide insurance information

Within twenty days after notice of the claim, the owner must fully and accurately provide specified renter and insurer information or face the statutory consequence.

The information includes

  • renter's name;
  • renter's address;
  • applicable insurance company; and
  • policy number or insurer claim number.
This is an Arizona-specific coverage-discovery tool. In a rental crash, send written notice promptly and document the twenty-day period rather than treating the rental company like an ordinary private vehicle owner.

Rental-counter insurance can add separate protection

A.R.S. §20-331 permits licensed rental car agents to offer insurance incidental to the rental transaction.

Supplemental liability

Additional liability protection for renters and authorized drivers.

UM/UIM

Rental insurance products may include uninsured or underinsured motorist protection.

Physical damage

Protection concerning loss or damage involving the rental vehicle itself, according to the product terms.

Arizona requires consumer disclosures. The rental agent must disclose that offered insurance may duplicate protection the renter already has and that purchase of the offered insurance is not required merely to rent the car.
Loss-damage protection is not the same thing as liability insurance. Determine exactly what product was purchased before using labels such as “full coverage.”

The Graves Amendment limits rental-company owner liability—but does not eliminate insurance duties

Federal law, 49 U.S.C. §30106, generally protects a qualifying rental or leasing company from liability imposed solely because it owns the vehicle.

Protected

Mere ownership liability

A qualifying rental company generally cannot be made vicariously liable solely because its vehicle was involved in the driver's crash.

Not Protected

Rental company's own wrongdoing

The federal statute does not immunize the rental owner from its own negligence or criminal wrongdoing.

Graves does not repeal §28-2166. Federal law expressly preserves state financial-responsibility and insurance standards and state liability based on failure to satisfy them.

A dealer or repair-shop loaner uses a special primary/excess rule

A.R.S. §28-4010(A) applies where insurance covers a person or business engaged in selling, repairing, servicing, delivering, testing, parking or storing motor vehicles.

Who is operating vehicle? Primary Excess
Dealer/shop or its employee/agent Motor-vehicle-business policy Other applicable insurance
Customer or other non-business operator Other insurance available to operator Motor-vehicle-business policy
This reverses the ordinary owned-auto presumption. A customer's own applicable insurance can be primary while the dealership or repair-shop policy is excess.

Peer-to-peer car sharing has its own Arizona insurance code

Arizona regulates peer-to-peer car sharing under A.R.S. §§28-9601 through 28-9616.

§28-9602

Required primary insurance

During each car-sharing period, the statute requires qualifying liability insurance at least equal to §28-4009 minimums.

Possible Sources

Owner, driver or platform

The required insurance can be maintained by the owner, shared driver, platform or a combination of those sources.

Fallback

Platform insurance

If relied-upon owner or driver insurance lapses or does not provide required protection, qualifying platform insurance supplies the statutory coverage from the first dollar and can carry a duty to defend.

§28-9604

Personal-policy exclusions allowed

Arizona expressly permits personal insurers to exclude broad categories of coverage during the car-sharing transaction.

The owner's personal policy may exclude nearly everything during sharing

Section 28-9604 permits exclusions encompassing:

  • bodily-injury liability
  • property-damage liability
  • UM
  • UIM
  • MedPay
  • comprehensive
  • collision
Do not assume the vehicle owner's ordinary policy remains primary during peer-to-peer sharing. Arizona specifically authorizes personal-policy exclusions for this use.

For car sharing, exact beginning and ending times matter

Section 28-9609 requires car-sharing agreements to warn that platform insurance applies only during the defined car-sharing period.

Coverage can change when the sharing period ends. Use after the contractual termination time may fall outside the platform's insurance while the owner's or driver's personal policy may also contain a sharing exclusion.

Preserve

  • reservation timestamp
  • car-sharing start time
  • scheduled termination time
  • actual return time
  • platform app records
  • vehicle access records
  • GPS data
  • agreement version

Build the complete insurance stack before deciding who pays

Layer 1 Insurance attached to the vehicle itself.
Layer 2 Driver's applicable personal non-owned-auto coverage.
Layer 3 Rental-company, dealer or peer-to-peer statutory insurance.
Layer 4 Optional supplemental liability insurance purchased for the transaction.
Layer 5 Employer or commercial-auto coverage if the trip involved work or business.
Layer 6 Umbrella or excess insurance.
Find coverage first. Determine priority second. A policy cannot be “excess” unless it actually applies to the driver, vehicle and loss in the first place.

Borrowed and rental vehicle workflow

Identify the legal vehicle category. Borrowed, rental, dealer loaner, peer-to-peer, employer vehicle or another category.
Identify the vehicle owner. Obtain title, registration or rental/share records.
Identify why the driver possessed the vehicle. Express permission, implied permission, rental contract, employment or sharing agreement.
Obtain the policy attached to the vehicle. Determine whether the vehicle was described or otherwise covered.
Obtain the driver's personal policy. Review temporary-substitute and non-owned-auto coverage.
Read the transaction agreement. Rental agreement, dealer loaner form or peer-to-peer sharing agreement.
Identify every supplemental insurance product. Liability, UM/UIM, physical damage, travel or credit-card protection.
Check authorization. Was the actual driver authorized by the owner, renter and written agreement?
Apply the correct Arizona priority statute. Ordinary vehicle, rental, motor-vehicle business or peer-to-peer system.
Investigate separate owner liability. Do not confuse the owner's insurance obligation with negligent entrustment, agency, family-purpose or other tort liability.
Identify commercial use. If the trip involved employment, delivery or business, continue to Guide 14.
Identify rideshare use. If a TNC digital network was involved, continue to Guide 15.

Borrowed / rental vehicle document checklist

  • vehicle registration
  • title information
  • owner's declarations page
  • owner's complete policy
  • driver's declarations page
  • driver's complete policy
  • umbrella policies
  • rental agreement
  • master rental agreement
  • authorized-driver list
  • online reservation records
  • insurance disclosure
  • supplemental liability election
  • physical-damage election
  • credit-card benefit terms
  • travel insurance terms
  • dealer loaner agreement
  • repair order
  • car-sharing agreement
  • sharing-period records
  • platform insurance policy
  • app / timestamp data
  • permission communications
  • texts between owner and driver
  • employment records if applicable
  • business-use evidence
  • coverage letters
  • reservation-of-rights letters
  • coverage denials

Common borrowed and rental vehicle mistakes

“Insurance always follows the driver.”

Arizona's ordinary liability priority rule often makes the policy on the owned vehicle primary.

“Insurance always follows the car.”

Also too broad. Dealer loaners, rentals and peer-to-peer sharing have special statutory systems.

“Permission from the renter guarantees the renter's personal policy covers me.”

Odom demonstrates why the actual non-owned-auto definition must be read.

“The rental company must always provide primary liability coverage.”

Current §28-2166 contains prescribed disclosures and exceptions that can change the priority.

“Graves means the rental company has no insurance obligation.”

Wrong. Federal law expressly preserves state financial-responsibility and insurance standards.

“A peer-to-peer rental is just borrowing a friend's car.”

Arizona has a separate statutory insurance system and expressly permits personal-policy exclusions during car sharing.

Arizona authority map

Primary Law · A.R.S. §28-4009 Permissive-user liability coverage

Requires an owner's motor-vehicle liability policy to cover the named insured and qualifying express or implied permissive users of the covered vehicle.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §28-4010 Primary and excess liability coverage

Establishes Arizona's owned-auto priority presumption and specialized priority rules for motor-vehicle businesses.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §28-2166 Commercial rental vehicles

Establishes rental-owner financial responsibility, primary/excess rules, third-party claim duties, renter insurance-information requirements and consequences of noncompliance.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §20-331 Rental-car insurance products

Regulates insurance offered incidentally to rental agreements and requires disclosures concerning optional and potentially duplicative coverage.

Federal Law · 49 U.S.C. §30106 Graves Amendment

Preempts liability imposed solely by ownership against qualifying rental/leasing businesses absent their own negligence or criminal wrongdoing, while preserving state financial-responsibility laws.

Arizona Court of Appeals · 2007 Odom v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Arizona

Holds that Arizona's omnibus statute did not require a personal owner's policy to cover a second permissive driver of a rental car where that non-owned vehicle did not satisfy the policy's coverage definition.

Arizona Supreme Court · 1986 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Bogart

Addresses competing primary/excess provisions involving rented and non-owned automobiles and illustrates why applicable coverage must be identified before other-insurance clauses are reconciled.

Arizona Supreme Court · 2011 Young v. Beck

Reaffirms Arizona's family purpose doctrine as a potential source of vicarious owner liability separate from automobile insurance coverage.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §28-9602 Peer-to-peer car-sharing insurance

Requires primary liability insurance during the car-sharing period and establishes fallback program coverage in specified circumstances.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §28-9604 Personal policy exclusions during sharing

Expressly allows broad exclusions from the shared vehicle owner's personal policy for claims occurring during peer-to-peer car sharing.

Primary Law · A.R.S. §§28-9606 & 28-9609 Car-sharing vicarious liability and disclosures

Exempts specified parties from ownership-only vicarious liability and requires insurance and coverage disclosures in the car-sharing agreement.

Source-control rule: identify the legal category of vehicle first. Then apply the statute for that category before deciding that the owner's insurance, driver's insurance or rental/platform insurance is primary.

Frequently asked questions

If I borrow a friend's insured car in Arizona, am I generally covered?

Arizona's owner's-policy statute generally requires liability protection for a person using the covered vehicle with the named insured's express or implied permission, subject to lawful exclusions and the actual policy.

Whose liability insurance is usually primary on an ordinary borrowed car?

Under A.R.S. §28-4010(B), the policy in which the vehicle is described or rated as an owned automobile is generally primary, with other applicable liability insurance excess.

Does my personal auto policy cover every rental car I drive?

Do not assume so. Read the policy's non-owned-auto, temporary-substitute, permission, regular-use and other applicable definitions and exclusions.

If I rent a car and let a friend drive it, is my personal policy automatically responsible?

No. Odom demonstrates that the personal policy's non-owned-auto definition can restrict who receives coverage when using the rental vehicle.

Is the rental company's insurance always primary in Arizona?

No. Section 28-2166 begins with a primary-coverage rule but contains statutory exceptions involving prescribed rental-agreement disclosures and purchased rental liability insurance.

Why does the rental statute still show 15/30/10 when ordinary Arizona minimums are 25/50/15?

Section 28-2166 is a specialized rental-vehicle statute with its own stated amounts. Section 28-4009 governs ordinary motor-vehicle liability policy minimums. The two statutory systems should not be conflated.

What information must an Arizona rental company provide after a crash?

Section 28-2166 creates a twenty-day mechanism involving the renter's name, address, applicable insurer and policy number or claim number. Failure to provide the specified information can trigger additional statutory duties for the rental owner.

Does the Graves Amendment mean I cannot ever sue a rental company?

No. It generally bars liability based solely on rental-company ownership of the vehicle. It does not immunize the company's own negligence or erase Arizona financial-responsibility obligations.

Is rental collision protection the same as liability insurance?

No. Liability protection concerns injury or damage caused to others. Collision, physical-damage or loss-damage protection concerns the rented vehicle itself according to the governing terms.

Whose policy is primary when I drive a dealership or repair-shop loaner?

Arizona has a special rule. When a customer rather than the motor- vehicle business or its employee is driving, the business policy is generally excess to other insurance available to the operator.

Is a peer-to-peer shared car treated like borrowing a friend's car?

No. Arizona has a separate statutory car-sharing system requiring primary insurance during the sharing period and expressly allowing personal insurers to exclude coverage for sharing activity.

Can the owner's personal policy exclude a peer-to-peer car-sharing loss?

Yes. A.R.S. §28-9604 expressly permits broad exclusions, including liability, UM/UIM, MedPay, comprehensive and collision.

Identify the vehicle relationship before deciding which insurance follows it.

Find the vehicle owner, the driver's authority to use it, every policy on the vehicle, every policy protecting the driver, and every rental, dealer or sharing agreement. Then apply the Arizona statute governing that particular vehicle relationship and determine which applicable coverage is primary, excess or excluded.

Public legal education only. VictimsGuide.com provides public-interest legal education. It does not provide individualized legal advice, does not offer or accept legal representation, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Borrowed, rental, dealer-loaner and peer-to-peer car-sharing claims depend on the actual policies, agreements, driver authorization, vehicle use, statutory category and current Arizona and federal law. Verify controlling primary authority before legal reliance.